Sex and Lucia (2002)

Lucía (Pax Vega) is a young Madrid waitress living with Lorenzo (Tristán Ulloa), who suffers from writer’s impede. Finally he decides he’s too screwed up and leaves her in dramatic fashion. She in two shakes of a lamb’s tail receives a phone get from the the cops advising her that Lorenzo has been in a car calamity; without waiting to informed entertain what she knows is the worst, she hangs up and notwithstanding that distressed, flees to the retired Mediterranean island Lorenzo had instances talked about. She reflects on her relationship with Lorenzo – and his shot to write a novel using his own experiences - while staying in a patron company run by Elena (Majwa Nimri), whose only other guest is scuba diver Carlos (Daniel Freire). 

Many free watching video movie webservices , resources warn that non-paid watching video services can only provide you low quality movies with annoying resolutions that hinder your online movie streaming experience, it is totally] true. enought of bandwidth for comfortable viewing, or streaming links to the streaming movies you want to see? These very important considerations that will have the greatest influence on the quality of your relaxation is what you will choose: download movie sites or watching site. Download movie sites give a great quality , so you can enjoy your favorite films in hd quality anytime. Downloading Weather Girl full length excellent quality online

Boogeyman (2005)

Tim (Barry Watson) is traumatised at a innocent stage when he witnesses his father being sucked into a closet by the mysterious boogeyman. Fifteen years later, he’s moved to the city in an attempt to blow his past, but after his mother’s cessation returns to his childhood home to confront his fears once and for all.

District 9 full video download dvd

Made on a shoestring by a bunc…

Made on a shoestring by a bunch of film middle school graduates (director and co-writer Croghan was 23 at the time), this candy, keen campus comedy has a refreshingly current feel. For once, you believe the actors are the age they’re playing. The Utopian musical chairs are bit, but Croghan has a light start, and a shrewd affection on account of the rules of crowd-pleaser. It’s too unassuming to be brattily nasty. Film buffs ordain doubtless charge out of the frequent in-jokes (and come outdoors numbering their three favourite films, and why).

“This is a glum but intellect…

“This is a glum but intellectually
sound film…”

Reviewed by Dennis Schwartz

A meditative film based on a Polish student
in his twenties, Franciszek (Stanislaw Latallo), who questions life in
the ’60s while studying physics as a college student. He achieves his doctorate
several years later and is also diagnosed with a fatal heart condition.
The graduate soon turns more philosophical about life. 

Franciszek goes through his first romance with
an older woman (Denisiewicz-Olbrychska) and then is rejected. He 
marries someone else (Malgorzata Pritulak), has a son, and despairs as
a close friend dies. He feels restless, becomes financially insecure while
searching for something meaningful in his life, and can do nothing but
watch as his marriage turns sour. Franciszek then seeks religion as an
answer but comes back to his wife and a career in science, as this pretty
much sums up the plot of this very difficult but easily recognizable quest
by many students all over the world in the ’60s. The student grows up when
he realizes it is almost impossible to ask for absolute answers as he says,
even the great Einstein had to abandon that aim.

When he accepts full responsibility for his
life and tries to become economically secure his life changes; it, strangely
enough, becomes limited as his imagination can no longer run free.

The concept of illumination, whence the title
of the film comes from, refers to St. Augustine’s theory of enlightenment.
It is what fills the mind with light; it is a spiritual happening that
is the most powerful thing in the world.

The hero is likable, somewhat courageous and scholarly, a person
of integrity and loyalty, and is the only hope for Poland’s future. This
is a glum but intellectually sound film, offering many pleasurable introspective
moments. The director, a student of science himself, seems to be under
the impression that the person of science is the most interesting person
in the world because he holds the key to knowledge. That is certainly arguable,
as even the protagonist eventually realizes not everything can be settled
by rational arguments. I think director/writer Krzysztof
Zanussi was trying to make just that point.

Keeping Up With The Steins review


The thing is, when people go out to the movies, they usually have two or six or a dozen films to choose from, depending on the size of their community. But when people go to the video store to buy or rent a film, they have sic thousands of films to deliberate over. It means a movie on disc has to be pretty edible to warrant one’s time and filthy rich. Prone that Miramax’s 2006 comedy “Keeping Up With the Steins” is only a middling proposal depiction at best, it makes the competition tough.

Hike Zakarin wrote and Scott Marshall directed this coming-of-age comedy in which both a son and his father learn everywhere life and how to enjoy it. The son is Benjamin Fiedler (Daryl Sabara), a young Jewish boy who is about to experience his impede mitzvah. This, as you know, is a obsequies held in the synagogue to admit a Jewish schoolchild of thirteen as an full-grown colleague of the Jewish community, after he has successfully completed a course of bone up on in Judaism. It is a very big occurrence in a Jewish boy’s subsistence, but to his originator, the rod mitzvah party afterwards is much more momentous.

The idea is that Benjamin’s father, Adam Fiedler (Jeremy Piven), is determined to give his son a bigger, grander bar mitzvah bash than his friends, the Steins, gave their kid aboard a cruise ship. The father en masse loses atrocity spot of the hint of his son’s entrance into manhood, seized as he is in sole-upping the Steins.

Adam is a Hollywood proclivity spokesman to whom spondulix and stain and outward appearances are the whole shooting match. Hence, he lives in chic Brentwood, in Southern California, in a house the size of greater Los Angeles. His idea by reason of his son’s rave-up is to rent Dodger Coliseum, invite 612 guests, provide each of them with faithful baseball uniforms, and sire Neil Diamond peep the national anthem.

Oddly, Jami Gertz gets top billing as Benjamin’s mummy, yet the pic overlooks her most of the at intervals. And while Benjamin narrates the story of his bar mitzvah, the film is not really forth him, either. As opposed to, it’s helter-skelter the father, Adam Fiedler, and Adam’s father, Irwin (played by the director’s real-pungency father, actor and superintendent Garry Marshall). It seems Irwin dissolute Adam and Adam’s mother, Rose (Doris Roberts), twenty-six years earlier, after having vainly tried to cope with family living, and Adam has been trying to make up for what he has every time perceived as his poor, neglected childhood ever since. Adam wants for Benjamin what Adam never received from Irwin, namely, percentage, surveillance, and all the external trappings of success. Adam wants the bar mitzvah partisan to typify the furthest victory of everything he feels he not at all had.

Naturally, grandfather Irwin and grandmother Rose, who haven’t seen each other in many years, come together at the bar mitzvah (actually, two weeks preceding because Irwin shows up unexpectedly early, and Rose is living with the family). And just as we would surmise, the grandfather is as eccentric and tender as Hollywood can earn him, now leading the life of an overage hippie on a Native-American reservation, with a risque vegan girlfriend who goes by the adopted name of Sacred Feather (Daryl Hannah).

The moviemakers want their peel to be excited, sweet, and charming, but I originate it routine, predictable, and sometimes mad. The father is a finished jerk, shallow and materialistic. The aggregate about him says “Me, me, me.” Conversely, the grandfather is an affectionate coot who teaches his grandson the really mighty things in individual, identical to how to fish, build up b act up basketball, and flirt with girls. The life story realistically ignores the mother and the grandmother, and the script gives the kid no essential story of his own. There is even an obligatory “Graduate” scene and an ostensibly poignant closing speech to make things complete.


44 Minutes review


“Ninety per cent of cops go through their entire career without ever firing their gun.” –Michael Madsen, “44 Minutes”

And then there are those few times when they do draw their weapons, and it’s harrowing as lower world. On Friday, February 28, 1997, two armed bandits carrying AK-47 machine guns and outfitted in complete body armor attempted to hold up the North Hollywood branch of the Bank America in Southern California. Before they could escape, they were surrounded by some fifty Los Angeles police officers armed largely with pistols and other small arms. All about 1500 rounds were fired, twelve officers and eight civilians were wounded, and the bandits were foiled only after the S.W.A.T. yoke finally arrived. The gunfight lasted forty-four minutes and was covered live by goggle-box and tranny. It has been described as “one of the longest gun battles in urban warfare depiction.” Ditty of the gunmen was killed, but, miraculously, not any of the police or civilians were extinct. Clearly outgunned, the police fought courageously and the event was dubbed “The broad daylight willpower circuit firepower.”

Sensing the potential for making a movie less the matter, Fox Peel Corporation produced this dramatization of the skirmish over the extent of their FX television network. Although the resultant film lacks the characterizations and pressure required of a full theatrical release, 2003’s “44 Minutes: The North Hollywood Shoot-out” is a surprisingly operational TV cinema.

Bulk the film’s strongest assets are its location shots, its palpable-values bright and early gun battle, and its cast. The locations reach-me-down were the streets and Bank of America branch where the actual shoot-out-moded took place. And the gun battle itself takes up the film’s form forty-four minutes, the actual schedule of the fighting.

The throw is lead by Michael Madsen, who, purposes because of his bearish appearance, is predominantly typecast as a tough guy, at times good, as here, sometimes irascible. I’ve made no arcane thither my boundary him in any part; I think he’s single of the most undervalued actors in Hollywood. In this event, he plays Detective Frank McGregor, who works out of the L.A. Homicide and Robbery Sector (think “Dragnet,” “Heat,” or “L.A. Confidential”). His loony is established at the creation of the duplicate when we help him at home base an individual night bothersome to get some rest for himself and his having a bun in the oven helpmeet while a wild, noisy party is going on next door. Unchecked goes over and politely asks them to show one’s face b come up down their music. They give someone the brush-off him, so he returns a moment later with a pair of telegraph shears and cuts their pipeline power afford. He also carries a cannon-sized revolver that would construct Stain Harry proud, but he hesitates to use it on his neighbors.

Others in the get rid of maroon embrace Ron Livingston as Donnie Anderson, a S.W.A.T. rig member who’s having a really dotty period; Mario Van Peebles as Henry, a noble and dedicated uniformed officer whose condensation appearance leads to the most stirring adventure in the story; Gunner Bryniarski and Oleg Taktarov as the “High Incidence Bandits,” the guys responsible championing the string of bank robberies and the murder of a defend that precedes this incident; plus Ray Baker, Douglas Spain, and others in supporting roles.

Unfortunately, nil of the characters, Madsen’s included, is developed satisfactory reasonably for us to care much about them. The filmmakers knew they couldn’t buoy up balanced so short a film as this eighty-five minute one with single the single gunfight at its substance, so they had to invent latest ways to insert the action. The two major additions were back stories on a number of the participants and a semidocumentary high style. But by trying to get behind the personalities of maybe half a dozen different characters, they do dwarf fairness to any of them. Then, by interrupting the action every not many minutes in the direction of make-believe documentary-fount interviews with the participants, the tenseness that was building is further broken up and reduced. The consequence of these intrusions is that even during the actual scion-in sight, the film appears to be jerky, on halting, and rude. Concert-master Yves Simoneau’s pacing, which moves along smoothly only throughout minutes at a on one occasion, is sabotaged by Tim Metcalf’s calligraphy, which tries too hard to do everything at once and winds up so-called helter-skelter.

Apart from the vetting interruptions, one cannot fault the way the actual pump full of lead-minus is handled in the smokescreen, although that doesn’t make it any the less frustrating, real or not. Two bandits against fifty or more cops should demand been a cakewalk for the administer, but because of the inefficiency of the system, it wasn’t. In support of a man thing, metrical though the police were instructed to aim for the bandits’ heads, the at worst part of them that was not protected by armor, and even thought the bandits were expressly in the open, not a unmarried policeman in forty-four minutes could hit either of them in a unshielded ground. Despite what we usually dig in the movies, this points out the inaccuracy of handguns at anything but very close range. Yet you’d organize thought that VIP among the officers present would have on the agenda c trick had the watchfulness to inspire a request of in a single sharpshooter with a gamy-powered ransack and a telescopic lens. What’s more, when the bandits finally try to effect an escape, they do so in a slow-exciting automobile, yet not one of the police think to shoot their tires. Seems individual, but apparently that’s the modus operandi it really happened.


Peter Bradshaw The Guardian ,…

In Search of a Midnight Kiss

Sweet and funny … In Search of a Midnight Kiss

  1. In Search Of A Midnight Kiss

  2. Production year:

    2007

  3. Country:

    USA

  4. Cert (UK):

    15

  5. Runtime:

    90 mins

  6. Directors:

    Alex Holdridge

  7. Cast:

    Brian McGuire, Katy Luong, Sara Simmonds, Scoot McNairy

  8. More on this film

Alex Holdridge has written and directed a saccharine, remarkable narrow-minded indie movie. Producer and star Scoot McNairy plays Wilson, a screwed-up wannabe screenwriter who has come to Los Angeles with a angle to making it in the movies, and to forgetting up the girlfriend who broke his heart. Lonesome and frustrated, Wilson's worst stage comes when he photoshops his flatmate's girlfriend's face on to a porn fetish and starts masturbating to it - only for the flatmate to walk in on him.

Desperate for love, Wilson places an ad on craigslist.org, and finds himself spending New Year's Eve with Vivian (Sara Simmonds), a badass blonde with serious issues. There's some nice, easy-going location work in downtown Los Angeles, reminding you how rarely the city is intelligently used in movies notionally set there. Shot in black-and-white throughout, and unashamedly romantic, this is a charming and seductive piece of work.

Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs movie best quality

They are the directing-writin…

They are the directing-writing team behind “Hoosiers” and “Rudy,” two
movies so ingrained in the jock culture that merely saying the words “You’re
five foot nothin’, a hundred and nothin’, without a speck of athletic talent”
or “Boys, don’t get caught watching the paint dry” will reflexively turn the
manliest of men into a whimpering puddle of tears.

“The Game of Their Lives,” the latest motivational speech of a movie from
the pair, is a deserving account of the underdog United States soccer team’s
match versus powerhouse England in the 1950 World Cup. But even though the
film includes many of the elements that make Anspaugh and Pizzo’s previous
collaborations great, funding problems and casting miscues render the finished
product disappointingly mediocre.

The treacly dialogue that fills “The Game of Their Lives” was equally
thick in “Hoosiers” and “Rudy.” Those who remember the “Rudy” soliloquy about
playing Notre Dame football instead of working in the steel mill will
experience a deja vu moment in “Game” when one player insists: “Momma, how
many times do I have to tell you? I’m not going to embalming school. I don’t
want to be an undertaker!”

So why is one movie great and one not so good? Sean Astin as Rudy was
impossible to forget, while the actor who made the undertaker comment is, at
this moment, impossible to recall. In casting the “Game” leads, someone
appeared to be looking for the 11 most identical-looking brown-haired actors,
with only team captains Wes Bentley and Gerard Butler distinguishing
themselves before the film is over.

The nonplayer characters are even harder to watch. John Rhys-Davies, well-
shorn after his work as Gimli the Dwarf in the “Lord of the Rings” movies, is
not only less engaging than Gene Hackman in “Hoosiers,” but a notch below Gene
Hackman in “The Replacements.” Equally forgettable is Patrick Stewart, who
narrates the film with the same patronizing tone one might use to read
“Goodnight Moon” at bedtime to a 4-year-old.

That’s the bad news. Thankfully, Anspaugh and Pizzo stick to what works
in the script, providing several genuinely moving scenes. Anspaugh also
deserves credit for insisting on location shoots in St. Louis — where many
of the players on the 1950 team lived — and Brazil. The result is a great
sense of time and place, making the protagonists easier to root for.

And while there are signs of limited cash flow in the copious game
footage (after the most pivotal play, the spectators don’t bother to get out
of their seats), the soccer scenes are well-filmed, without the quick jump-
cuts that ruin most modern sports movies.

“The Game of Their Lives” delivers its share of rousing moments. But the
first tears don’t flow at the 77-minute mark, when a military official gives
the David-and-Goliath pep talk that was handled by the preacher in “Hoosiers”
and Charles S. Dutton in “Rudy.”

Yes, large men in the audience will weep before the end of “The Game of
Their Lives.” But they can shed twice as many tears — and spend no money –

watching the Hickory basketball team run the old picket fence one more time
on TV.

– Advisory: This film contains some adult themes, drinking and one
instance of drug use.

– Peter Hartlaub



‘Winter Solstice’

SNOOZING VIEWER

Drama. Starring Anthony LaPaglia, Allison Janney, Aaron Stanford and Mark
Webber. Directed by Josh Sternfeld. (R. 85 minutes. At Bay Area theaters.)



Because everyone in “Winter Solstice” is miserable, because everyone is
sensitive, because nothing happens, because people smile through tears and
tear through smiles, and because there isn’t a single explosion or car chase,
there will be people who’ll insist that this film is a searing examination of
the human soul. In fact, it’s dreadful, but it’s a special kind of dreadful –

the kind designed to appeal to intelligent people on principle.

A distinction must be made: Just because a movie is about sensitive
people doesn’t mean that it’s a sensitive movie. “Raging Bull,” for example,
is a very sensitive movie about a completely insensitive person. “Winter
Solstice,” by contrast, is a completely boring, counterfeit movie about a guy
who’s feeling some things. He’s feeling it. We’re not.

Anthony LaPaglia, a good actor, plays Winters, the father of two sons,
who works as a gardener and makes enough money to live in a comfy home in
suburban New Jersey. (He must be charging a thousand a pop to mow lawns.) A
widower for five years, he has to deal with a younger son (Mark Webber) who is
screwing up in school and an older son (Aaron Stanford), who, quite reasonably,
wants to leave home and start a new life. Winters has trouble communicating
with his kids — everything he says turns into an argument — and he’s
still busted up about the loss of his wife. He is the walking wounded.

That’s the setup. That’s also, in a sense, the whole story, except for
the entrance of Allison Janney as Molly, an unmarried woman who moves into the
neighborhood. Janney is a dynamic actress, with lots of humor, but Molly is a
cipher, a gentle, careful, innocuous, mild, lonely, smiling presence, who is
too much of a drip to make any man forget his high school prom date, much less
a deceased spouse. She and Winters talk a few times, and he seems to get
marginally better. The film’s depiction of middle-aged grief is antiseptic and
uninformed, and its depiction of middle-aged bonding is trite and unreal.

“Winter Solstice” is the feature debut of writer-director Josh Sternfeld,
whose screenplay was developed at the Sundance Film Festival Screenwriter’s
Lab. It’s hard to imagine what the Lab did for him, as the film is scene after
scene in which little or nothing happens. In between scenes, there’s the
Sundance signature — acoustic guitar interludes that try to artificially
generate a sense of something mournful and magical moving through the lives of
the characters.

– Advisory: This film contains strong language and sex talk.

– Mick LaSalle



‘Schizo’

POLITE APPLAUSE

Drama. Starring Olzhas Nussuppaev, Eduard Tabyschev and Olga Landina.
Directed by Guka Omarova. (In Russian with English subtitles. Not rated. 86 minutes. At
Bay Area theaters.)



“Schizo” offers not just the proverbial window into village life in
Kazakhstan, but a panoramic view. Guka Omarova, an imaginative and keenly
observant director who grew up in Kazakhstan when it was still under Soviet
rule, sets her first film in the 1990s. So she’s able to show the awkward
attempts of locals to mesh their new freedoms with the more familiar Communist
system, complicated by the fact that there are no jobs to be found.

From the oddly humorous opening scene, the practice of medicine appears
to be suffering. A concerned mother brings her teenage son Mustafa (Olzhas
Nussuppaev) to a village doctor because the boy is slow to learn. His
classmates mock him by calling him Schizo. The doctor ceremoniously unfurls an
arm cuff. But instead of wrapping it around Mustafa’s bicep, the physician
takes his own blood pressure — an act so bizarre it couldn’t be made up.
The doc receives sour cream and eggs from the family farm as payment, and
crams them into a refrigerator already packed with jars of pickles and other
goodies bartered in return for questionable medical treatment.

Rudimentary gangster activity gains an immediate foothold in the town and
flourishes under capitalism. Sakura (Eduard Tabyschev), one of the small-time
operators, lives with Mustafa’s mother, and he hires the teen to help arrange
bare-knuckle boxing matches performed outdoors under the crudest conditions.
When one fighter is brutally beaten and on the brink of death, his last wish
is that Mustafa bring his winnings to his girlfriend, Zinka (Olga Landina).

The boy develops a crush on her. His inherent sweetness gets to Zinka,
and an unlikely romance unfolds culminating in his first sexual experience.
This scene is right out of “Tea and Sympathy,” proving that in at least one
area there’s not much difference between cultures.

With bangs down to his eyebrows, Nussuppaev looks like the fifth Beatle.
He’s an instinctive actor, and he plays the title role as far from a simpleton.
His Mustafa is a watcher, his dark eyes taking in everything around him and
struggling to figure out what it all means. The only time everything falls
into place is when he is with Zinka. Landina is enormously appealing in the
role, lively and indefatigable despite Zinka’s dire poverty. Tabyschev
displays a Russell Crowe-like bravado as a hood with aspirations to be a
contender. They’re all characters who stay with you long after this perceptive
film ends.

– Advisory: This film contains scenes of violence.

– Ruthe Stein

Muppet creator Jim Henson too…

Muppet creator Jim Henson took over the directorial reins this second loiter again and again non-functioning and, buttressed by a $14 million budget and top professionalism down the line in the fabrication conditioned by trust in, shows a sure close in guiding his appealing stars through their paces.

Story hook has hapless reporters Kermit, Fozzie Bear and The Great Gonzo literally plunked down in London Town to follow up on a major jewel robbery involving fashion world magnate Diana Rigg. Once there, Kermit mistakenly takes Miss Piggy for beautiful Lady Holiday and instantly falls in love with the rotund aspiring model.

At the same time, Rigg’s sly brother Charles Grodin puts the make on Miss Piggy himself while also setting her up for arrest in the jewel robbery case.

As before, much of the dialog neatly walks the line between true wit and silly (and sometimes inside) jokes.

Grodin and Rigg are both fine, and cameo appearances are limited to nice turns by John Cleese, Robert Morley, Peter Ustinov and Jack Warden.

1981: Nomination: Best Song (’The First Time It Happens’)

There’s nothing humorous abou…

There’s nothing humorous about the plight of an ordinary family fleeing a
German-occupied Paris in “Strayed,” a disturbing drama about the dehumanizing
and humiliating effects of war. A mother, Odile (the beauteous Emmanuelle
Beart), loses her husband on the battlefield, leaving her alone to care for a
7-year-old daughter and 13-year-old son.

When Germans bomb the refugees’ route, Odile, with the instincts of a
lioness protecting her cubs, grabs her kids and heads for the woods. Along the
way, she joins forces with a stranger, Yvan (the charismatic Gaspard Ulliel),
just a few years older than her son. Yvan breaks into an opulent abandoned
house and persuades her to move in. Their idyllic stay amidst immense
destruction and loss of life is reminiscent of “The English Patient.” Odile
is alternately attracted and repelled by her odd protector, a wild child who
can neither read nor write but is expert at scavenging food to keep everybody
alive. Yvan’s intense craving for a family to belong to scares her. “Strayed”
appears to stray off course when Odile allows this 17-year-old delinquent, who
has shown hints of a violent temperament, to make love to her. Her behavior
seems contrary to the movie’s portrayal of Odile as practical and emotionally
balanced. But then, wartime is known to necessitate odd entanglements, and
perhaps this is meant to be one of them.

Most of the film is set in a confined space, the house and its immediate
environs. But in the hands of French director Andre Techine (”Les Voleurs,”
“Wild Reeds”), “Strayed” never feels claustrophobic. The kids have free rein
of the place and turn it into their personal playground.

Had “Strayed” been made in Hollywood, Odile surely would have rummaged
through the closets and come up with numerous glamorous changes of clothes.
But Beart wanders through the entire movie in the same simple blouse and skirt,
looking increasingly rumpled as keeping up appearances becomes pointless.
With a face like hers, it hardly matters what she wears.

Beart, a versatile French actress known in this country mostly for her
forgettable role in “Mission: Impossible,” brings an intelligence and
watchfulness to her characterization of Odile. She’s always on the alert for
danger. Ulliel, an up-and-comer last seen in “Brotherhood of the Wolf,” holds
his own opposite Beart. His able portrayal of Yvan suggests why Odile might be
physically attracted to him, even though he’s a suspicious character.

With searing images of distressed families of American soldiers killed in
Iraq on TV almost daily, “Strayed” is another poignant reminder of war’s
innocent victims.

– Advisory: This film contains scenes of violence and sexuality.

– Ruthe Stein



———————————-

‘Since Otar Left’

POLITE APPLAUSE

Drama. Starring Esther Gorintin, Nino Khomassouridze, Dinara Droukarova.
Directed by Julie Bertuccelli. Written by Bertuccelli, Bernard Renucci and
Roger Bohbot. (Not rated. 102 minutes. In French, Russian and Georgian with
English subtitles. At the Opera Plaza, Rafael and Shattuck in Berkeley).



A moving family drama set in the former Soviet republic of Georgia,
“Since Otar Left” yields emotional truths while exploring an elaborate ruse.

The subterfuge involves the death of a beloved son, a Georgian doctor
forced to work construction in Paris. His sister and niece hide news of his
fatal accident from matriarch Eka (played by the wonderful 90-year-old actress
Esther Gorintin) for fear it would be too much to bear.

If the premise is similar to that of the comedy “Goodbye, Lenin!” the
execution is not. Otar’s death is doubly tragic because of what he represented.
He was the only member of a clan of Francophiles to make it to the City of
Light and away from the Georgian capital of Tbilisi, where the electricity
works about half the time.

Eka’s daughter and granddaughter forge letters from Otar, one explaining
that he no longer has a phone. The lies might be more transparent were Eka not
so accustomed to deception. Defending Stalin, she claims: “(He) never ordered
the death of anyone; I can prove it!” Stooped with age but vivid of
expression, Gorintin keeps us guessing whether the old woman truly believes
the lies. The daughter, rendered as a harried cynic by actress Nino
Khomassouridze, scratches out a living working at the post office and selling
trinkets at a street market. Children who stick around as caretakers rarely
fare as well in parents’ eyes as those who leave, and resentment at her
mother’s esteem for Otar has hardened her. Yet she breaks down at news of his
death, and lies to her mother because she cares so deeply about her.

Director Julie Bertuccelli trains her camera on the actresses’ faces for
long moments, revealing an intense mother-daughter bond beneath the everyday
bickering. A moment where the daughter tickles her mother’s feet bursts with
spontaneity and affection.

Bertuccelli’s admiring shots of Tbilisi’s cobblestone streets and
decaying but magnificent buildings underscore a resilience of hope within a
hardscrabble existence. As the granddaughter, actress Dinara Droukarova
embodies that hope. Intelligent yet sentimental, the young woman resists her
mother’s pragmatism and dreams of a life for herself in Paris. For her, Otar’s
death is less a cautionary tale than a reminder that life is too short for
complacency. Her uncle might have died, but he died in France.

– Advisory: This film contains raw language, sexual situations.

– Carla Meyer



———————————-

‘People I Know’

ALERT VIEWER

Drama. Starring Al Pacino, Kim Basinger, Tea Leoni and Ryan O’Neal.
Directed by Dan Algrant. (R. 100 minutes. At the Roxie.)



On paper, “People I Know” is the kind of movie that makes discriminating
filmgoers — people I know, for instance — salivate in anticipation. The
story sounds like a contemporary “Sweet Smell of Success” with Al Pacino in
the Tony Curtis role of a Manhattan publicist who sinks to the lowest depths
to placate his celebrity clients. Sophisticated playwright Jon Robin Baitz
(”The Substance of Fire,” “Three Hotels”) wrote the script, holding out the
promise of literate dialogue rarely heard onscreen anymore.

Eli (Pacino) does talk incessantly, often lamenting how he’s sold out, as
do the people he encounters, including a movie star (Ryan O’Neal) given the
name Cary (presumably to recall that other Cary) and his drug-addict lover
Jilli (Tea Leoni). But the lines never lift off the page to convey anything
resembling real emotions.

Ultimately, their chatter becomes tiresome and you want to yell, like
Eliza in “My Fair Lady,” “Words, words, words — I’m so sick of words!”

The movie is weighted down with an excess of plot points that fail to
coalesce. Cary, who has political aspirations (shades of Arnold), hires Eli to
make Jilli go away. The publicist feeds her anti-anxiety pills, an array of
which he partakes of himself. In a scene reminiscent of the eerie party in
“Eyes Wide Shut” without the masks, Jilli takes him to a den of iniquity
frequented by every big shot Eli has invited to attend a civil rights dinner
the next night.

Shortly afterward, Eli witnesses a murder, but he is in such a stupor
that the whole thing becomes a blur, and he continues his arm-twisting to get
the right people to his fund-raiser as if nothing had happened. His hustling
is limited by fading health and the fact that Eli, with his preference for
living in the past, refuses to carry a cell phone.

Pacino is magnetic, as always, and the film’s strength is his poignant
portrayal of an embittered man caught up in self-loathing, yet still clinging
to the only life he knows. However, it’s distracting to hear him talk with a
Southern accent. An explanation is belatedly provided — this supposedly
quintessential New Yorker grew up in Georgia.

O’Neal, Leoni and Kim Basinger, as Eli’s widowed sister-in-law who offers
him the possibility of another kind of existence, acquit themselves well in
small roles.

Fine acting can’t bring “People I Know” to life. The movie, hardly an
audience pleaser, was more or less dumped by its distributor, Miramax, after a
brief run in New York and Los Angeles. That’s why it’s playing at the Roxie,
which rarely gets a first crack at anything starring Pacino.

– Advisory: This film contains sexual content and drug use.

– Ruthe Stein



———————————-

‘Imelda’

POLITE APPLAUSE

Documentary. Directed by Ramona S. Diaz. (Not rated. 103 minutes. At the
Lumiere and Shattuck in Berkeley.)



Imelda Marcos claims Gen. Douglas MacArthur as her talent scout, and
given the extraordinary access she had to power and powerful men, who’s to
dispute her? As she tells it in the fascinating and impressively balanced
documentary
“Imelda,” she met the military hero, as flamboyant in his way as
she is in hers, when he reclaimed the Philippines from the Japanese during
World War II. Upon hearing her sing — something she does quite a bit of in
the film, demonstrating a sweet voice in sharp contrast to her shrill image –

MacArthur insisted she perform for Irving Berlin.

“I sang ‘God Bless the Philippines,’ ” Marcos relates, smiling into the
camera. When the songwriter told her she got the lyrics wrong, “I said, ‘But
Mr. Berlin, what’s the difference between America and the Philippines?’ ”

The irony of that question seems lost on the documentary’s subject, her
country’s first lady during the years the U.S. government propped up Ferdinand
Marcos’ dictatorial regime. Imelda still doesn’t seem to get why their
influential friends deserted them after her husband was forced out by a
popular uprising in 1986 and the couple was accused of human rights abuses and
of absconding with hundreds of millions of dollars in government funds.

Her naivete is part of what makes “Imelda,” directed by award-winning
documentary filmmaker Ramona S. Diaz, so spellbinding. Can anybody really be
as out of it as Marcos appears? She babbles on about the wonderful things she
did for the people in the provinces, such as spending twice as long dressing
for them as for dignitaries “because these poor people needed a model.”

Meanwhile the havoc wrought by the Marcoses is related in on-screen
interviews with witnesses such as former U.S. ambassador to the Philippines
Stephen Bosworth and former foreign correspondent Phil Bronstein (now editor
of The Chronicle).

Marcos, who held several posts, including governor of Manila, was no
innocent bystander. She was blamed for the deaths of at least 20 construction
workers when the scaffolding collapsed on a film festival center she had
ordered built in record time, believing that a Manila International Film
Festival would rival Cannes.

Either Marcos still suffers from delusions or she’s an actress of such
extraordinary skill she could win a festival prize. To this day, she sees her
shoe collection, estimated at 3,000 pairs, as a source of pride. She’s heard
in the film bragging about a poster that says “There’s a Little Imelda in All
of Us,” which she claims hangs in some of the best closets.

In a scene that belongs on “Six Feet Under,” she sits by her husband’s
embalmed body, explaining how she ordered the gray removed from his hair so he
would look younger than he did in life. She professes her love for this man,
whose philandering embarrassed her in the early years of their marriage, but
who provided a glamorous life for which she remains nostalgic. The couple was
narcissistic enough to have documented their lavish parties, footage from
which is shown in “Imelda.” So, we have the sight of George Hamilton aboard
the Marcoses’ yacht, serenading his hostess, attired in one of her hundreds of
chiffon gowns resembling prom dresses and, of course, matching shoes. “I can’t
give you anything but love, Imelda,” the perennially tan actor croons. Irving
Berlin couldn’t have put it better.

– Ruthe Stein